-I believe Newt has it wrong. It's a hand down deal for Newt to take out pp in a debate, or a series of debates, but the sad truth is, it's just a a debate. One college history professor against another college legal professor. That's not the objective. We need some one with a business background as president/CEO and knows and has dealt with the real world business and working with people. The only one in the CTPR party is now running ahead of the other candidates so far. Who really cares what tax bracket anyone is in now, and what does this have to do with nation's primaries.
-pp has allegely sent a secret letter to Iran, tell them to bach off the idea to sea blockade of the Strait of Hormux, or he will do the same thing he did over the Iraian capiture of our spy drone as few weeks ago...nothin'.
-Survey says: "Rich Vs poor seem as the key struggle in US or that's the spin the LDPs want us to believe. The 99% Vs 1%. Really... 89% of the 99% state the rich are rich because of inheritance or their own hard work of a compenation thereof. So why would anyone disagree with those attributes? Then the survey says 80% of the 99%are not interested in taking from the 1% and are more interested in a policy to build economic growth. Thus it can be said the vast majority of the 99% want the opportunity to be rich, but they don't want to work for it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment