SC shoots down EPA Mandate

1-Seldom coming out of DC surely not, in the last almost 7 years, for anyone or body thereof to suggest a cost-benefit analysis proceed any action plan. 2-Y'hear the other day, the SC slammed the EPA for attempting to shut down this country's energy generating capacity, which is coal based at >43+ % of total generating capacity. Option: just raise utility rates so high it drives our weak economy back into recession. 3-The EPA is a non-elected bunch of "Ultra-Greens" who are clueless of reality. They will do anything to please the POTUSA, to whom they report. 4-This is exactly what happen when in the 1990s EPA set such impossible standards on the US Chemical Industry that it drove most of that Industry out of business or that current technology was moved overseas. 4-How? With emission limits that are BAT impossible. Where "Best Available Technology" doesn't exists. Or so costly or time consuming to R&D and build. Its more cost effective to buy than to make certain products in the third world. 5-The 2015 SC suggested the EPA take there new mandate on air/water pollution limits back to the drawing board and do a cost to benefit analysis before attempting to target specific industries, especially energy. 6-Until the EPA wraps are taken off nuclear energy, coal,oil and gas will be the base source of electrical energy in this country. Green energy generation can only play the role or into service to trim peek loads.