Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Post Presidentional Debate #2 Hang Over.

-To the world's Shock and Awl, the POTUSA had an epiphany of sorts, right on stage of last night's Presidentional Debate #2. A short time into the Town Hall Type Debate when the POTUSA dropped a statement bomb. The POTUSA was on cross by the Challenger, when the topic of what happened at the US Benghazi, Libya Consulate and safe house "distribance" on 09.11.2012, and with reference made to MP's statement...from high in the Andes Mountains of Peru, SA; MP on 09.10.12 PM released a statement indicating that all matters of security... buck stops with her office. She was literally falling on her sword, for the POTUSA and others. It was a terrorist attack on 911 from the get go. In the VPOTUSA Debate the GI said "We" didn't receiving any information other than it was a "disturbance"? What was going on in many other Muslim nations around the world on 911? - Tonight, tonight... The POTUSA said it was a terrorist attack on 911 (2012)in Libyan and he said so in the Rose Garden Briefing 9.12. (2012). The Challenger asked the POTUSA to repeat the statement, when the CNN proctor jumped in to save the POTUSA. The CNN proctor said it in the Rose Garden transcript of the 09.12.2012. (This had to be rehersed prior to Debate by CNN and LDP) Fact check, yep it's in there alright in general terms, way down the body of the statement. Give me a break! Amatures! Oh! what a web we weave, when we first deceive... the POTUSA flat out lied. - Now the LDP weave-misters have to, why did he cancelled his standing WH security meeting on 09.12.2012, this after 4 Americans were killed? Attended two other non-related securities DC meetings before leaving Dodge City for Las Vagas and other spots on campaign. This don't boyd well for the POTUSA. -This is another reason for not having early voting, except for the oversea military, until the debates are over. -Libyan topic is certain to be on the agenda, but what will the CBS proctor do incharge? For sure the Challenger will wedge this question into to topics of discussion to cause reason doubt in undecides, and pole sitting LDPs.

No comments:

Post a Comment